Legal Opinion
Mullen v. Ippolito Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 10, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
FUENTES, P.J.A.D.
Plaintiffs John Mullen and Howard Levine own a one-family house in an area of the Borough of Point Pleasant Beach that is *88zoned exclusively for low density residential use. Plaintiffs’ residence is adjacent to the Driftwood Motel, a preexisting nonconforming use in this otherwise residential zone. The Driftwood is owned and operated by defendant Ippolito Corporation, the principals of which are defendants Samuel and Paul Ippolito.
Over the past thirteen years, plaintiffs have complained to municipal officials in Point Pleasant Beach…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garrou v. Teaneck Tryon Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Borough of Princeton v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer Cty.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- State ex rel. Ferry v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1879
- Marini v. Borough of WanaqueNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Hopewell Valley Citizens' Group, Inc. v. Berwind Property Group Development Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bellocchio v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Save Camden Pub. Sch. v. Camden City Bd. of Educ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- CONCERNED CITIZENS OF LIVINGSTON VS. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON (L-2171-16, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- JOHN AND MARY SCHEIBELHOFFER VS. BRICK TWP. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (L-0719-17, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- MICHAEL RANTZ VS. PLANNING BOARD OF BAY HEAD (L-0626-17, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.