Pierce v. County of Solano
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County. R. H. Latimer, Judge Presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
In this action the plaintiff prayed that the organization of a -certain road improvement district be adjudged void and the defendants enjoined from further proceedings in connection therewith. Defendants were given judgment, and plaintiff has appealed.
The proceedings sought to be annulled were had under the “Road District Improvement Act of 1907.” On the third day of January, 1922, the hoard of supervisors adopted a resolution of intention to order certain road work to be done, containing the following provisions material to this discussion: “Resolved, that it is the intention of the hoard of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hewlings v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Dillingham v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. WeitzelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Loew's Inc. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Municipal Improvement Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Pierce v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.