Allen v. totes/Isotoner Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} This case arises from a grant of summary judgment in favor of totes/Isotoner Corporation, LaNisa Allen’s employer, on a discrimination complaint arising out of the Ohio Fair Employment Practices Act, R.C. Chapter 4112, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 138 Ohio Laws, Part I, 1430, 1431-1432. We originally accepted Allen’s discretionary appeal, which sought review of the issue whether Ohio law prohibits an employer from discriminating against a female employee because of or on the basis of lactation. For the reasons stated below, we find that summary judgment was properly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Hood v. Diamond Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Sidney Simpson v. Des Moines Water WorksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
3Cited by24 opinions
- State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. GoodenowOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- LGR Realty, Inc. v. Frank & London Ins. AgencyOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- Miller v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re RETAINING VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE, L.L.P., AS SPECIAL COUNSELOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. TaverasOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.