Oakland Police Officers Ass'n v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, P. J.
Plaintiffs, Oakland Police Officers Association and certain police officers, sought writ of mandate and declaratory judgment which would decide that police officers of the City of Oakland be furnished without charge, handcuffs, flashlights, batons, gun holsters, gun belts, handcuff cases, service revolvers, bullet cases, and other related equipment. It is plaintiffs’ position that these items are safety equipment and therefore, under the provisions of Labor Code, section 6401, must be furnished by the employer, the city. They appeal from a judgment after trial by court, which in effect was in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stafford v. Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- California Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- California Comp. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Work Uniform CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- California Correctional Supervisors Organization, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Bendix Forest Products Corp. v. Division of Occupational Safety & HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Sav-On Drugs, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Sacramento County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.