Legal Opinion

Sanford v. John Finnigan Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1914No. 5294PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; S. G. Tayloe, Judge. Action by the John Finnigan Company against John R. Sanford and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Sanford appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

This is a suit on a promissory note for $8,971.12, executed by appellant and W. M. Sanford, Jr., and payable to appellee. It was alleged that W. M. Sanford was absent from the state and insolvent, and therefore he was not sued by appellee. Appellant defended on the ground that the note was sued by appellant to cover amounts embezzled by W. M. Sanford, Jr., under threats that he would be indicted and prosecuted for embezzlement if the note was not given by appellant. The cause was submitted to the jury on special issues. Appellant admitted appel-lee’s cause of action, unless it was defeated by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co v. GormleyTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Moore v. H. Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. Kimmarle & Hirsh v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Rose v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bush v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. West v. CashinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Alling v. Vander StuckenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Southerland v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. United Employers Casualty Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API