Legal Opinion

Holloman v. Clarke

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 28, 2017No. Civil Action No. 14-12594-NMGPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge

This case involves claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by an inmate, pro se litigant Tajuan Holloman (“plaintiff’) against 26 defendants. Pending before the Court is 1) plaintiffs motion for a subpoena duces tecum to be served on Fiona DiGiandomenico, a personnel officer for the Department of Cor*103rections (“DOC”) and 2) a motion to strike that motion brought by a group of 20 of the defendants (“defendants”).

Plaintiff seeks to issue a subpoena duces tecum to discover the proper substitute party for defendants Harold Clarke and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Visiting Nurse Ass'n Gregoria Auffant, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. Gill v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
  2. Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
  3. Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
  4. Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
  5. Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API