Legal Opinion

Gill v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 7, 2005No. 04-1944PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

This case raises the question of recognition of an informant’s privilege and the associated public interests which underlie the privilege. The issue comes to us on arguments from a third-party investigative arm of an association of private race tracks, that the district court, under Fed. R. Civ. R. 26, erred in failing to recognize those interests when it ordered disclosure of the identities of informants who told of illegal activities by the plaintiff. We vacate the order and remand.

I

Michael J. Gill, an owner of thoroughbred race horses, filed a false light defamation…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Noonan v. Staples, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Katz v. Pershing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. Godin v. SchencksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. Walsh v. Teltech Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. Gonzales v. Google, Inc.District Court, D. North Carolina · 2006

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API