Magid v. Beaver
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
“The wife is a feme sole as to her separate estate, unless controlled by the settlement. Every restriction upon her power in it must be complied with; but while the wife may contract, she may not bind her separate estate-by any contract of suretyship nor by any assumption of the debts of her husband, and any sale of her separate estate, made to a creditor of her husband in extinguishment of his debts, shall be absolutely void.” Code, § 53-503. “The contract of suretyship is one whereby a person obligates himself to pay the debt of another in consideration of credit or indulgence, or other…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. Leffler Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Skinner v. BraswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Saxon v. National City BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Garrett v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Meeks v. WithersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Magid v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938