Legal Opinion

Magid v. Beaver

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1937No. 26270PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

“The wife is a feme sole as to her separate estate, unless controlled by the settlement. Every restriction upon her power in it must be complied with; but while the wife may contract, she may not bind her separate estate-by any contract of suretyship nor by any assumption of the debts of her husband, and any sale of her separate estate, made to a creditor of her husband in extinguishment of his debts, shall be absolutely void.” Code, § 53-503. “The contract of suretyship is one whereby a person obligates himself to pay the debt of another in consideration of credit or indulgence, or other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Leffler Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Skinner v. BraswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Saxon v. National City BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Garrett v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Meeks v. WithersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Magid v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API