Moscatiello v. Hilliard
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
Appellants invested $1.5 million in a single mutual fund managed by appellees. Appellants signed customer agreements with appellees containing an arbitration clause and a choice of law provision. The arbitration clause stated any disputes would be settled in arbitration under National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) rules, which the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., governs. The choice-of-law provision stated Pennsylvania law would govern.
After losing $574,000 in the mutual fund, appellants filed multiple claims with the NASD against appellees…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Weinar, M. v. Lex, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Zions Management Services v. RecordUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Del Ciotto v. Pennsylvania Hospital of the University of Penn Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Letke Security Contractors, Inc. v. United States Surety Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.