Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Vernatter v. Warden, West Virginia Penitentiary

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1999No. 25952PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeGRAW, Justice:

Appellant Roy David Vernatter appeals the circuit court’s refusal to grant him habe-as corpus relief on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, where his primary allegation was that trial counsel were ineffective in failing to have arranged for him to undergo a psychiatric examination prior to his pleading guilty to first-degree murder. We affirm the judgment of the lower court, concluding that there is sufficient evidence in the record supporting the court’s finding that counsel undertook reasonable investigation of possible mental defenses prior to counseling…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. State v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Watts v. BallardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State Ex Rel. Kitchen v. PainterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State Ex Rel. Hatcher v. McBrideWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Coleman v. PainterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. SER William R. Adkins v. Dennis Dingus, WardenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API