Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Carson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1960No. Civ. 24088PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment in favor of the city of Los Angeles in an action to recover municipal license taxes.

At the times involved in this action, the defendants were copartners. They conducted their business under the name of Cross Town Lines. The defendants’ place of business was in Lynwood and they had no established place of business in the city of Los Angeles. In 1953 and 1954, they operated buses on schedule over fixed routes through Compton, Lynwood, Huntington Park, Downey, Bellflower and Paramount. None of their equipment was garaged in the city of Los…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Security Truck Line v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Franklin v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Associated Beverage Co. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Web Service Co. v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. City of Los Angeles v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. City of Los Angeles v. California Motor Transport Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API