Legal Opinion

Howard v. Weisberg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1979No. 19809PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOREY, Justice.

In this suit for attorneys’ fees, the trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that defendant failed to file an answer in the form required by Tex.R.Civ.P. 185. Appellant contends that his answer was not required to comply with Rule 185 because plaintiffs’ petition did not set out a systematic record of charges and payments as required by the rule. We agree with appellant’s contention and reverse and remand.

Rule 185 provides in pertinent part: When any action or defense is founded upon an open account or other claim for goods, wares and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Copeland v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Hassler v. Texas Gypsum Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Biscamp v. Zeno Carpet CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Juarez v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Wilson v. Brickstone Products CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Panditi v. Apostle, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  2. Jones v. Ben Maines Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Breaux v. Allied Bank of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Abe I. Brilling Insurance Agency v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Johnson v. Americana MotelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API