Legal Opinion

Eller v. . Dent

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The liability of the defendant, W. L. Dent, is not predicated solely upon the negligence of the son in driving the father’s truck on the day in question (Linville v. Nissen, 162 N. C., 95, 77 S. E., 1096), but upon the alleged negligence of the father in permitting the 15-year-old son to operate his truck upon the highway in violation of law. Taylor v. Stewart, 172 N. C., 203, 90 S. E., 134. If this alleged negligence of the father be the proximate cause, or one of the proximate causes, of plaintiff’s injury, as the jury has so found, then W. L. Dent has properly been held liable in damages…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Linville v. . NissenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Taylor v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Grier v. . GrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Reich v. . ConeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Gaffney v. . PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Taylor v. . CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. State v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API