Legal Opinion

Taylor v. . Caudle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The liability of the owner of the car is predicated upon his alleged negligence in intrusting his automobile to a reckless and incompetent driver, one given to habitual and excessive use of liquor, and known to be irresponsible or untrustworthy. Eller v. Dent, 203 N. C., 439, 166 S. E., 330; Robertson v. Aldridge, 185 N. C., 292, 116 S. E., 742; Tyree v. Tudor, 183 N. C., 340, 111 S. E., 714; Elliott v. Harding, 107 Ohio St., 501, 140 N. E., 338; 36 A. L. R., 1128. There was ample evidence to support this allegation.

While it would seem the jury might .well have answered the issue of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Elliott v. HardinsOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Robertson ex rel. King v. AldridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Tyree v. TudorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Tyree v. . TudorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hutchens v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Bogen v. . BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Samuels v. BowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API