Legal Opinion

A.F. Construction Co. v. Virgin River Casino Corp.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2002No. 37585PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*701OPINION

2Per curiam

In this appeal, we consider whether a deed of trust beneficiary is a necessary party in a mechanic’s lien enforcement proceeding. The district court granted partial summary judgment in favor of respondent Virgin River Casino Corporation (“Virgin River”) in a subsequent consolidated action to quiet title and for declaratory and injunctive relief.1 In its order, the district court concluded that Virgin River, a deed of trust beneficiary, was a necessary party and that failure to name Virgin River in the mechanic’s lien enforcement proceeding left its interest unaffected by the…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Posadas v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State Industrial Insurance System v. United Exposition Services Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Salas v. Allstate Rent-A-Car, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State, Department of Motor Vehicles v. VezerisNevada Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. County of Clark v. Sun State Properties, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hardy Companies, Inc. v. SNMARK, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  3. J.D. Construction, Inc. v. IBEX International Group, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Schettler v. RALRON CAPITAL CORPORATIONNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  5. George J. v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API