A.F. Construction Co. v. Virgin River Casino Corp.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*701OPINION
2Per curiam
In this appeal, we consider whether a deed of trust beneficiary is a necessary party in a mechanic’s lien enforcement proceeding. The district court granted partial summary judgment in favor of respondent Virgin River Casino Corporation (“Virgin River”) in a subsequent consolidated action to quiet title and for declaratory and injunctive relief.1 In its order, the district court concluded that Virgin River, a deed of trust beneficiary, was a necessary party and that failure to name Virgin River in the mechanic’s lien enforcement proceeding left its interest unaffected by the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Posadas v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- State Industrial Insurance System v. United Exposition Services Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Salas v. Allstate Rent-A-Car, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
- State, Department of Motor Vehicles v. VezerisNevada Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- County of Clark v. Sun State Properties, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Hardy Companies, Inc. v. SNMARK, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- J.D. Construction, Inc. v. IBEX International Group, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Schettler v. RALRON CAPITAL CORPORATIONNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- George J. v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.