City of Piqua v. Hinger
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
The question raised in this case is whether the ruling in Miranda is applicable in misdemeanor cases.
We have examined the record in this case and find that Schmerber v. California, 384 U. S. 757, is applicable and dispositive of the issue of admissibility of the questioned evidence.
At the outset, it should be noted that no material objection was made to the questions that defendant was asked prior to being advised of his constitutional rights. The record is clear that the questions asked during the filming of the physical tests were solely for the purpose of getting defendant to speak and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Kettering v. HollenOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Oregon v. SzakovitsOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. BrandenburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. ArsenaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.