Kohler v. Flynn
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
Don Kohler appeals a judgment dismissing his claim against Tangula Flynn for division of assets and debts after their cohabitation ended. We affirm.
Don and Tangula began living together in May 1990. They kept separate checking accounts, although Don deposited a disputed amount of his sporadic earnings in Tan-gula’s account, resulting in what the trial court termed a “common pot arrangement.” The couple bought a mobile home in Tangula’s name, with Don making the down payment and Tangula making subsequent payments. They occasionally paid one another’s debts, including some…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Blotske v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Lindvig v. LindvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Cermak v. CermakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- McKechnie v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Baker v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Hartman v. GragerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.