Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kentucky Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Chenault & Orear

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 1, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Fulton

Reversing.

The appellees, Chenault & Orear, a partnership composed of Lee Orear, C. C. Chenault and C. C. Chenault, Jr., were engaged in the garage business in Mt. Sterling. Lawrence Young, a former employee, filed a claim for compensation with the Unemployment Compensation Commission, which, if allowed, would be charged against the reserve account of the firm to the amount of $65.28. The claim was allowed by a referee after a hearing but the referee’s decision was set aside on request of the appellees and another hearing was set on March 17, 1943.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boone v. LightnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Kendall v. BeilingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  3. Moore v. Louisville Hydro-Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. McKim v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kendall v. BeilingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  2. Burchfield v. PingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  3. Merchants Wholesale Grocery Co. v. City of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  4. Adkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
  5. Department for Natural Resources & Environmental Protection v. Blackhawk Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API