Legal Opinion

Moore v. Louisville Hydro-Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 23, 1928PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Logan

Affirming.

The appellant was injured while working for the appellee, and on June 7, 1926, he filed his application for compensation before the Workmen’s Compensation Board for hernia and other injuries. He claims that he was at all times willing to subject himself to an operation for hernia, but he did not have the funds to pay the expense of such an operation, and that the appellee would not cause the operation to be performed at its expense; /that the board allowed him compensation for other injuries, but dismissed his claim for hernia; that he thereafter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moore v. Louisville Hydroelectric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jefferson County Ex Rel. Coleman v. ChiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Pritchett v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  4. Stewart v. HertenNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Simmons v. Clark Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API