Legal Opinion

Doll v. James Martin Associates (Holdings) Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 21, 1984No. Civ. A. 84CV-7282-AAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOINER, District Judge.

This case is before the court on the motions of all defendants to dismiss. For the reasons stated herein, the motions are granted in part and denied in part.

FACTS

The facts are largely uncontested by defendants for the purposes of these motions, although there are some points of dispute concerning the extent of the defendants’ business activities in this country. For purposes of these motions, all disputed facts must be resolved in favor of plaintiff, Bonney v. Upjohn Co., 487 F.Supp. 486, 491 (W.D.Mich.1980). Because the motions and responses…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tracinda Corp. v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AGDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  2. In Re Stat-Tech Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
  3. Huang v. Sentinel Government SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  4. Obee v. Teleshare, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
  5. Sheldon Co. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API