Sherry Walker v. Medtronic, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNCAN, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Sherry Walker appeals from the district court’s holding that her common law tort claims against Medtronic, Inc. are preempted by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (“MDA”), as interpreted by Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312, 128 S.Ct. 999, 169 L.Ed.2d 892 (2008). Walker argues that, because the device in question allegedly failed to operate in accordance with the terms of its premarket approval, her claims parallel federal requirements and therefore should avoid preemption. In light of Walker’s concession that the device was designed,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Equal Rights Center v. NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATESCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Elizabeth and Clifford Kemp v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Caplinger v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Gross v. Stryker Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Lewis v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
- McConologue v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Nicole Weber v. Allergan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.