Legal Opinion
Van Brunt v. Rauschenberg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 9, 1992No. 91 Civ. 5662 (JSM)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARTIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff William Edwin Van Brunt, III (“Van Brunt”) commenced this action against Defendant Robert Rauschenberg (“Rauschenberg”), a world renown artist, alleging, inter alia, breach of contract and conversion and replevin. Previously, this Court dismissed the complaint with leave to replead. Defendant Rauschenberg now moves, for the second time, for a dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Van Brunt met Rauschenberg in New York City in 1968 and the two…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Sharp v. KosmalskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- ICD Holdings S.A. v. FrankelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- 80 Nassau Associates v. Crossland Federal Savings Bank (In Re 80 Nassau Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Lennon v. SeamanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Sudul v. Computer Outsourcing ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Weizmann Institute of Science v. NeschisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.