Maybank v. S. S. Kresge Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
The sole question of this appeal is whether a directed verdict was erroneously entered for defendant. Considering the evidence under the standard set forth in Kelly v. Harvester Company, 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971), the evidence, in a light most favorable to plaintiff, was sufficient to carry the case to the jury on the claim of breach of an implied warranty but insufficient to carry the case to the jury on the claims of breach of an express warranty, negligence and strict liability. The trial court erred in directing a verdict on the claim of breach of an implied…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Rose v. Epley Motor SalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Reid v. Eckerds Drugs, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Jackson v. NEILL McKAY GIN COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Red Hill Hosiery Mill, Inc. v. Magnetek, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Bussian v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Seaside Resorts, Inc. v. Club Car, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
- Wilson Brothers v. Mobil OilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Stiles v. Chloride, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.