Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Hall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1999No. 96-01-37207; CA A100167PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Wife appeals from a dissolution judgment, challenging the trial court’s division of property. ORS 107.105. She assigns error to the trial court’s determination that certain investment accounts (Waterhouse accounts) were “separate” property rather than marital assets, and argues that the trial court’s division of the accounts resulted in an inequitable distribution. Husband cross-appeals, also assigning error to the property distribution. We agree with wife that, to the extent the Waterhouse accounts contain marital assets, they must be considered in the equal distribution of marital assets…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Matter of Marriage of SticeOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Matter of Marriage of MasseeOregon Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Marriage of ProctorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API