In the Matter of Marriage of Proctor

Wife seeks reconsideration of our decision in Proctor and Proctor, 234 Or App 722, 229 P3d 639 (2010) (Proctor III). She contends that we erred in construing or applying the law pertaining to an award of prejudgment interest on the supplemental judgment under review. ORAP 6.25(l)(e). Wife also asks that we modify our opinion to explicitly state a time from which any interest is owed on the increase in the equalizing judgment ordered in the case. We allow reconsideration and address only wife’s second contention.

The parties have been arguing for many years about the proper division of assets…