O'CONNELL v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
These proceedings involve the right of defendant William Decker to recover from his codefendant, Robert Jackson, attorney’s fees incurred in defending an action brought by plaintiffs, Walter O’Connell and Russell Stier. Under a cross-claim by Decker against Jackson, the court held that Decker was entitled to indemnity against Jackson for the judgment obtained against Decker in the action, but made no allowance for attorney’s fees which he had incurred in defending it. This appeal is from that portion of the judgment which denied Decker’s motion that such attorney’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Inhabitants of Westfield v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Daly v. BergstedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Crosetti Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Conrad v. SuhrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- United States Fire Insurance v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Sorenson v. Safety Flate, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.