Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Palmer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1916No. Docket No. 60PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Eaton; Clement Smith, J. Bill by Malvina A. Palmer against Mark Palmer and Stanton E. Clark for a decree extending the time of redemption from foreclosure of a mortgage. Defendant Palmer died before the trial. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant Clark appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant Mark Palmer owned a farm of 80 acres as tenants by the entireties and gave a mortgage on the premises. Default having occurred in the payment of this mortgage, a statutory foreclosure was started, and the premises were sold upon July 6, 1914, to the defendant Clark for $3,500, of which amount $2,767.63 was necessary *80to satisfy the claim of the mortgagee, leaving a surplus in the hands of the sheriff of $732.37.

The defendant Mark Palmer and the plaintiff, who are husband and wife, were living together at the time the mortgage was given, but later separated, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newman v. LockeMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Mina v. General Star Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Gordon Grossman Building Co. v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Flynn v KorneffelMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State of Michigan Ex Rel Marcia Gurganus v. Cvs Caremark CorpMichigan Supreme Court · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API