Legal Opinion

State of Michigan Ex Rel Marcia Gurganus v. Cvs Caremark Corp

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2014No. Docket 146791, 146792, and 146793PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, C.J.

This case concerns three actions — two class actions and a qui tarn action brought in the name of the state of Michigan — involving allegations that multiple pharmacies in Michigan systematically violated MCL 333.17755(2) by improperly retaining savings that should have been passed on to customers when dispensing generic drugs in the place of their brand-name equivalents. Under MCL 333.17755(2), when a pharmacist receives a prescription for a brand-name drug and instead dispenses the generic equiva*51lent, the pharmacist must “pass on the savings in cost to the purchaser. . . The statute is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Roberts v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. Borchard-RuhlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. Portus (In Re Portus)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. in Re Keyes EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mich.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  4. Hiatt Joint Living Trust v. Prairie Creek Golf Course IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. James R Bradley Jr v. Prudential Security IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API