Legal Opinion

Weihing v. Preto-Rodas

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 28, 2017No. AC38488Published

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Kristina Weihing, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants, Robert J. Preto-Rodas and Margaret Preto-Rodas, in this action brought pursuant to General Statutes § 22-357. 1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) admitted photographs of the defendants' dog and (2) denied her motion to set aside the jury's verdict and for a new trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts from the testimony at trial. On June 27, 2011, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Owen v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. Atkinson v. SantoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Arnold v. MoriartyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API