Legal Opinion

Doe v. Horne

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided July 7, 2023No. 4:23-cv-00185Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Helen Doe, et al., No. CV-23-00185-TUC-JGZ 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Thomas C Horne, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiffs filed this action on April 17, 2023, challenging A.R.S. § 15-120.02, which 16 provides that interscholastic or intramural “[a]thletic teams or sports designated for 17 ‘females’, ‘women’ or ‘girls’ may not be open to students of the male sex.” The law went 18 into effect on September 23, 2022. Plaintiffs challenge the implementation of A.R.S. § 15- 19 120.02 by Defendants Horn,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in ActionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Nancy Anne Spangler, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Pasadena City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Chih Shen Chen v. Inteplast Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API