Mangum v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the final order of the trial court which granted appellees’ post-trial motions and entered judgment in favor of appellees. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
Before addressing appellant’s claims, we will briefly recount the pertinent facts of this case. Appellant, Bruce Mangum, drove a friend’s car in the City of Philadelphia during the early evening hours of March 14, 1990. 1 Appellant traveled in an eastbound direction on Adams/Whittaker Avenue until he reached Roosevelt Boulevard, where he intended to turn northward onto the highway. Appellant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Al Hamilton Contracting Co. v. CowderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Hodges v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Boettger v. MiklichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hagans v. Constitution State Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Frank Burns, Inc. v. InterDigital Communications Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Hester v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims ACPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Kiker v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- McGee v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claim PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.