Legal Opinion

McGee v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claim Plan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant/Plaintiff, Diane McGee appeals from the judgment entered May 28, 1998 in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas in favor of Appellee/Defen-dant, the Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan. Appellant presents- the novel issue of whether an injured party, otherwise entitled to uninsured motorists benefits under the Assigned Claims Plan,1 75 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 1751-1757, forfeits her rights to those benefits when, after notifying and seeking the consent of the Plan, she settles with and releases a third party insured tortfeasor. Because we conclude that Appellant took…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Dyer v. TravelersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Rossi v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Melendez v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims PlanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hester v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims ACPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Kiker v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Hester v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims ACPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API