Legal Opinion

Nosik v. Scott

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1956No. 23515PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*45OPINION

By STEVENS, PJ.

The action of plaintiff sought the recovery of $305 from defendant, as the balance alleged to be due on an account for professional services rendered defendant by plaintiff.

Defendant, for answer, denied that the charges were reasonable, and asserted that the plaintiff had been paid in full.

He further pleaded an agreement, wherein he claimed the agreed total charge would be $200, which had been paid. Defendant then cross-petitioned, seeking the recovery of $100, which he claimed he had paid above the agreed amount of $200, by reason of threats of plaintiff’s collection…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. In Re Estate of SloaneOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API