Legal Opinion

Bridgestar Capital Corp. v. Nguyen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 14, 2018No. A160093PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, C. J.

*205In this judicial foreclosure action, plaintiff appeals a supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees to defendant Nguyen.1 The trial court entered the supplemental judgment after granting summary judgment for Nguyen on plaintiff's claims and entering a general judgment dismissing the action without prejudice. Plaintiff asserts that the court erred in three ways: (1) in designating Nguyen as the prevailing party on plaintiff's claims; (2) in allowing attorney fees to Nguyen although, in plaintiff's view, Nguyen had failed to plead an entitlement to fees as required by ORCP 68 C(2)(a); and (3)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Mulier v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Domingo v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Attaway, Inc. v. SafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Lumbermen's v. Dakota VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wedemeyer v. Nike Ihm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. Carter v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Int. Assn. Machinists, Woodworkers Local W-246 v. HeilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Much v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. Carter v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API