Legal Opinion
Winterhalter v. Workmen's Guarantee Fund Assn. of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1888No. 9913PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.
—Defendant is a corporation, and on the sixteenth day of March, 1880, plaintiff’s testator, Fritz Hoffmeister, became a member of such corporation, and for a valuable consideration received therefrom its certain promise, agreement, and certificate in writing, in the words and figures following, viz.:—
“ Workmen’s Guarantee Fund Association of San Francisco, California. No. 69.
“ This is to certify that Fritz Hoffmeister is a member of the Workmen’s Guarantee Fund Association of San Francisco, California, and as such is entitled to participate in the guarantee fund, to the extent of one dollar…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Woodmen of the World v. RutledgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- 2004 Stuart Moldaw Trust v. XE L.I.F.E., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Union & New Haven Trust Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Brotspies v. Dept. of Civil Service, NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Heake v. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.