Mahas v. Kasiska
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, C. J.
This is an action by Mahas to recover on a promissory note made by White and Kasiska. The note was payable “on demand.” It was executed August 23, 1920. Interest was paid by White to and including the year 1923. In 1924, Mahas demanded payment of the note from White, and in July, 1925, he demanded payment from Kasiska. Payment was not made and action was instituted October 6, 1925, more than five years after the date of the note. White was not served and did not appear. Kasiska pleaded the bar of the statute of limitations, C. S., sec. 6609, and from a judgment for Mahas, entered on a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Riddell v. Peck-Williamson Heating & Ventilating Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
- Cowhick v. ShingleWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
- Andrus v. BlazzardUtah Supreme Court · 1901
- Smith Sand & Gravel Co. v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dennis J. Sallaz and Marcy Fox v. Eugene (Roy) RiceIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Gramkow v. Farmers Cooperative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
- COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. v. DorseyIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Thomson v. Sunny Ridge Village PartnershipIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
- COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. v. DorseyIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.