Legal Opinion

COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. v. Dorsey

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2011No. 36734PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This ease relates to an effort to collect a fine in a criminal case. Collection Bureau, Inc. (Collection Bureau) appeals the district court’s order granting John Dorsey’s (Dorsey) motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the statute of limitations barred recovery of the fine imposed upon conviction. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

' Dorsey was charged by information with trafficking in methamphetamine by manufacturing in Shoshone County. At the conclusion of his trial, the jury found Dorsey…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coghlan v. Beta Theta Pi FraternityIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Baxter v. CraneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Shepherd v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Montierth v. DorssersIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Day v. Idaho Transportation DeptIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  3. COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. v. DorseyIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Drakos v. SandowIdaho Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API