Deutsch v. Mirbod
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Robert Deutsch, No. CV-21-08123-PCT-GMS 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Marc Mirbod, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Pending before the Court is Marc Mirbod and 110 AM LLC’s (“Defendants”) 17 Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17.) For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is granted in 18 part and denied in part with leave to amend. 19 BACKGROUND 20 The following facts from the complaint (Doc. 1) are construed in the light most 21 favorable to Plaintiff. Plaintiff is an Arizona resident who owned an interest in a 22…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.