Legal Opinion

Young v. Lumenis, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 26, 2004No. 1:03-cv-00655PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This patent action is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff, William P. Young, seeks an order enjoining Defendant, Lumenis, Inc. (“Lumenis”), from performing his patented surgical procedure for a feline onychecto-my and from aiding and abetting infringement by others. On December 10, 2003, this Court held a preliminary injunction hearing. Based on the arguments of counsel and the evidence presented at the hear ing, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

II. BACKGROUND

Pla…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Chemque, Inc. (Formerly Known as Chemque Canada, Ltd.) and Thomas & Betts Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eastman Outdoors, Inc. v. Blackhawk Arrow Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. Comfort Systems USA (Kentucky), Inc. v. AHM Bowling Green LLC d/b/a All Hours Mechanical et al.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
  3. Kalmbach Feeds, Inc. v. Purina Animal Nutrition, LLC, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API