Legal Opinion

Verhey v. McKenzie

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2009No. 20070234PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice..

[¶ 1] Jacqueline K. McKenzie appeals, and Jeffrey T. Verhey cross-appeals, from an amended judgment ordering McKenzie to pay $3,334 per month child support. We reverse and remand for recalculation of McKenzie’s child support obligation, concluding the district court erred in failing to apply the child support guidelines.

I

[¶ 2] McKenzie and Verhey were married in March 1990, divorced in January 1998 and had three children together. In the divorce judgment, McKenzie was awarded custody of the children, and Ver-hey received visitation and paid child support. Verhey and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Geinert v. GeinertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Minar v. MinarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Jarvis v. JarvisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Serr v. SerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Halberg v. HalbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Entzie v. EntzieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Becker v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Keita v. KeitaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Thompson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API