Employers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Haucke
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The question presented is: Does the fact that the alleged negligent acts and wilful misconduct happened during the commission of a crime absolve the sponsor from liability under sec. 85.08 (9) (c), Stats.?
It is stated in the complaint that Dean Haucke stole the Ferguson automobile and wrecked it while attempting to escape capture. The allegation of theft was necessary to qualify the plaintiff as a proper party to bring this action under the subrogation clause in its policy. But it is clear from the complaint that the action is based, not on the theft, but on the negligent operation which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rice v. Ashland CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Brown v. RolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Whitcomb v. KeatorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by10 opinions
- Reyes v. Greatway Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Swanigan v. State Farm InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Dombeck v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Dombeck v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- June Gilbertson v. Clifford De Long and Carolina Casualty Company, and Mutual Service Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.