Tilford v. Ramsey
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from, St. Louis Circuit Court. This case was substantially before this court before, and is reported in 37 Mo. 663. The facts are there set forth.
Read the full summary
Appeal from, St. Louis Circuit Court. This case was substantially before this court before, and is reported in 37 Mo. 663. The facts are there set forth. On the trial plaintiff asked the following instruction, which was given: “That if the jury believe from the evidence that the note here sued on was made by Abram S. Mitchell, and delivered at the date thereof to plaintiff or his agent, in renewal or satisfaction of a former note held by plaintiff, and due or about to be due; and further believe that at said date said Mitchell and the defendant Ramsey were partners in business under the firm…
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge
This case has once been before the court, and is reported in 37 Mo. 563. A trial by jury has since been had at a special term of the St. Louis Circuit Court, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. This judgment was reversed at a general term of the said court, and cause remanded, and is again brought hereby writ of error. We must first inquire whether there is such a final judgment as will authorize this court to review it.
The defendant has cited numerous cases in the U. S. Supreme Court, and in the State of New York before the change of its code in this respect, where judgments of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Strouse v. DrennanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Rankin v. PerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1838
- Tilford v. RamseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kelly v. City of HigginsvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Voullaire v. VoullaireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- State ex rel. City of Chillicothe v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- McKay & Hood v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Gray v. Doe Run Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.