Legal Opinion

In Re Daum

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1994No. 93-SP-181PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes to us from the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) as a reciprocal discipline case that arose because the Court of Appeals of Maryland disciplined respondent for his practice of law there without a license. We accept the Board’s recommendation and impose a public censure.

Respondent consented to a one-year suspension from the pro hac vice practice of law in Maryland. In reciprocal discipline cases, this court imposes an “identical discipline,” unless we determine that the misconduct established warrants substantially different discipline in the District of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In Re WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. In Re RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re DaumDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. In re RamosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API