Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Adams

Hamilton County Municipal Court

Decided November 8, 1974No. 74-02403PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

This matter is before the court upon defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on grounds that Section 909-5 of the Cincinnati Municipal Code, under which he is charged, violates defendant’s right of freedom of expression guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and is also unconstitutionally vague. Section 909-5, C.M.C., provides as follows:

“No person within the city of Cincinnati shall appear in a dress or costume not customarily worn by his or her sex, or in a disguise when such dress, apparel, or disguise is worn with the intent of committing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fletcher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API