Legal Opinion

Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. v. Dash

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 25, 1989No. Nos. 86-5187, 86-5207PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.

On this appeal we are asked to determine the availability of trademark and tariff act protections to an American company— which is owned by the same entity that owns the foreign manufacturer of a good, but which holds a valid American trademark for the foreign manufactured good— against parallel imports or so-called “gray-market” goods. Specifically, we are asked to determine whether § 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (1982), makes damages available to the American trademark holder for trademark infringement and if § 42 of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. TallentireSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Bethesda Hospital Assn. v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Societe Des Produits Nestle, S.A. v. Casa Helvetia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Versa Products Company, Inc. v. Bifold Company (Manufacturing) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Ferrero U.S.A., Inc. v. Ozak Trading, Inc. Doron GratchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Summit Technology, Inc. v. High-Line Medical Instruments Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1996
  5. Lever Brothers Co. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API