Legal Opinion

People v. Lander

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2005No. 98433PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride

In this appeal, we consider whether: (1) defendant Donald A. Lander’s court-appointed attorneys were required to comply with Supreme Court Rule 651(c) (134 Ill. 2d R. 651(c)), when his pro se postconviction petition was not timely filed; and (2) the allegations in defendant’s pleadings were sufficient to establish the delay in filing was not due to his culpable negligence. We hold that defendant’s attorneys were required to comply with Rule 651(c) in these circumstances, and defendant failed to establish he was not culpably negligent in the late filing. Accordingly, we reverse the judgments…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. People v. BoclairIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. RissleyIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. OwensIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. People v. SuarezIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. PerkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. LaPointeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2017

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API