Legal Opinion

Spivey v. Porter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 3, 1984No. 8213DC1301PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging that they owned certain land, defendants owned adjacent land, and defendants had trespassed on their land by building a fence thereon. They sought damages, an order restraining further trespass, and a declaration that they were the owners of the land described. By stipulation the action was treated as a processioning proceeding with associated issues of title by adverse possession.

The court, without a jury, established the common boundary as described in deeds offered by both parties and as indicated by various monuments on the ground. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Howard v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Price v. Tomrich CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Whiteheart v. GrubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bernard v. Central Carolina Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Carolina Builders Corp. v. Howard-Veasey Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Bernard v. Cent. Carolina Truck SalesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Stan D. Bowles Distributing Co. v. Pabst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Speedway Motorsports International Ltd. v. Bronwen Energy Trading, Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API