Legal Opinion

Roman Catholic Diocese of Lexington v. Noble

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2002No. 2002-SC-0659-MRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the motion of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Lexington (Diocese) to hold the Courier-Journal in contempt of Court. The motion is based on the publication by the Courier-Journal of an article on August 24, 2002, which published a summary of the contents of records that were ordered sealed by this Court on August 16, 2002. For a further procedural history of this case and how the records came to be sealed, see Roman Catholic Diocese of Lexington v. Noble, Ky., 92 S.W.3d 724 (2002). For the sake of this motion, we assume that it is true that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re Capital Cities/abc, Inc.'s Application for Access to Sealed Transcripts. Appeal of Capital Cities/abc, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Roman Catholic Diocese of Lexington v. NobleKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Cape Publications, Inc. v. BradenKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API