Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Grant

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 21, 2009No. 1 CA-SA 09-0082PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSEN, Judge.

¶ 1 Protective orders typically bar parties to a lawsuit from disseminating information they receive through discovery. At issue in this special action is a sanction order issued against a non-party to a lawsuit that publicly disclosed information it knew to be covered by such a protective order. Because a protective order generally does not bind a non-party and because the non-party in this ease did not agree to be bound by the order, we vacate the sanction order. 1

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Lennar Communities Development, Inc. and Sonoran Utility Services,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. In Re Zyprexa InjunctionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  5. Tavoulareas v. Washington Post Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Abel Cuellar v. Megan G. VettorelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API