State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Grant
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSEN, Judge.
¶ 1 Protective orders typically bar parties to a lawsuit from disseminating information they receive through discovery. At issue in this special action is a sanction order issued against a non-party to a lawsuit that publicly disclosed information it knew to be covered by such a protective order. Because a protective order generally does not bind a non-party and because the non-party in this ease did not agree to be bound by the order, we vacate the sanction order. 1
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Lennar Communities Development, Inc. and Sonoran Utility Services,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- In Re Zyprexa InjunctionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Tavoulareas v. Washington Post Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Abel Cuellar v. Megan G. VettorelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014