Legal Opinion

Ross v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

William J. Ross (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that Claimant is not entitled to reinstatement of his benefits. The Board concluded Claimant’s reinstatement petition under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) 1 was properly denied because Claimant’s benefits were suspended for more than 500 weeks before his petition was filed, and the defense of the limitation period was not waived. We affirm.

Claimant was injured in the course of his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DeMarco v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Smith v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Roussos v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Bey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Mearion v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reyes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. M. Walter v. WCAB (Evangelical Community Hospital)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Reyes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API