Ross v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
William J. Ross (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that Claimant is not entitled to reinstatement of his benefits. The Board concluded Claimant’s reinstatement petition under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) 1 was properly denied because Claimant’s benefits were suspended for more than 500 weeks before his petition was filed, and the defense of the limitation period was not waived. We affirm.
Claimant was injured in the course of his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- DeMarco v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Smith v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Roussos v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Bey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Mearion v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reyes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- M. Walter v. WCAB (Evangelical Community Hospital)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Reyes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009